Public · Sign in
MT
← Back to topic
LESSON PLAN

Pictorial Graphs and Data Representation

A
Apothem Team
Grade 2 · Data & Probability
LESSON AT A GLANCE
Warm-up
5 min
Explore
15 min
Formalize
10 min
Practice
12 min
Exit ticket
3 min

Warm-up

Display a concrete cube graph from a class survey. How would we show this same information without the cubes? Students suggest: draw pictures, use stickers. What rules should we follow? (One picture per person, all the same size, in columns.)

Explore

Full data cycle: (1) pose a survey question, (2) collect data from classmates with tally marks, (3) build a concrete cube graph, (4) transfer to a pictorial graph on grid paper (one drawn symbol per tally). Compare the two graphs: same data, different representations.

Formalize

Three-level questioning on the completed graph: Level 1 (direct): how many students chose autumn? Level 2 (compare): how many more chose summer than winter? Level 3 (interpret): what does this graph tell us about our class? What questions does it NOT answer?

Pictorial Graphs and Data Representation

Graph integrity discussion: what would happen if one student used a very large picture and another used a very small one? The large picture would look like more data. Why does the grid help? All symbols in the same-sized square keep the comparison fair. This is why standards in data representation exist.

Practice

Students conduct a class survey, build a concrete graph, transfer it to a pictorial graph, and answer 5 questions (at least one of each level). Exit ticket: write one thing the graph shows and one question it cannot answer.

Exit ticket

Students conduct a class survey, build a concrete graph, transfer it to a pictorial graph, and answer 5 questions (at least one of each level). Exit ticket: write one thing the graph shows and one question it cannot answer.

TIP  Building the concrete graph first and then transferring it to a pictorial graph is essential. The transfer makes the abstraction explicit: we are replacing a physical object with a symbol.
WORKED EXAMPLES
Example 1 — From cube towers to a pictograph: our pets survey

Step 1: Collect live data: each student places one cube on the row for their pet type. Suppose: dogs 7, cats 5, fish 3, none 6.

Step 2: Translate the concrete graph to paper: one drawn symbol (a simple circle sticker) per cube, rows labelled with the categories, symbols aligned in neat one-to-one columns so heights can be compared at a glance.

Step 3: Add the two pieces every real graph needs: a TITLE ("Our Pets") and a KEY ("each ⚪ = 1 child"). Without the key, the picture is decoration, not data.

Step 4: Read it at all three levels: How many have fish? (3.) How many more have dogs than cats? (2 — compare the overhang, don't recount both rows.) How many children were surveyed? (7+5+3+6 = 21.)

The through-line to keep saying: the graph must tell the truth by itself — a stranger should learn our pet data from the page alone.

Example 2 — Same data, two displays: tally chart vs. pictograph

Step 1: Survey favourite recess games and record with TALLIES first — the collecting tool: soccer 𝍸𝍸 (8), tag 𝍸| (6), swings ||| (3). Practice the five-bar gate: four strokes, fifth across.

Step 2: Convert the tallies to a pictograph — the DISPLAY tool: 8 symbols, 6 symbols, 3 symbols in labelled rows.

Step 3: Compare the two representations honestly: which is faster to record DURING the survey? (Tallies — one stroke per vote.) Which is easier to READ afterwards? (The pictograph — heights compare instantly.)

Step 4: State the workflow that professionals actually use: collect with tallies → display with a graph. Different tools for different jobs, and the data flows through both.

Quick integrity check: do the tally total and the symbol count match? 8+6+3 = 17 both ways ✓. If they disagree, the translation dropped or invented a vote.

Example 3 — A student's graph has no labels: "but I know what it means!"

The scene: a lovely column of stickers, no title, no row labels, no key. The maker can read it perfectly — today.

Step 1: Run the stranger test: cover the student's mouth (playfully) and ask a classmate to read the graph cold. "Something has seven… of something?" The graph fails without its maker attached.

Step 2: Let the maker experience the fix: add row labels (dogs, cats…), a title (Our Pets), and the key (each sticker = 1 child). Re-run the stranger test — now it reads itself.

Step 3: Name the principle: a graph is a MESSAGE to someone who wasn't there. Labels aren't decoration for the teacher; they're the part of the message that survives when you walk away.

Step 4: Institute the pre-flight check for every future graph: Title? Labels? Key? One-to-one symbols? Four boxes ticked before any graph is "done."

MATERIALS
Grid paper (graph paper)
Stamps or stickers for pictorial symbols
Survey question cards
Concrete graph materials (cubes)
Question prompt cards (3 levels)
WATCH FOR
!Students may draw pictures of different sizes. Require same-sized symbols in same-sized grid squares.
!Students may skip squares, creating gaps that look like missing data. Draw from the bottom of the column upward, filling each square.