Area of Triangles, Parallelograms, and Trapezoids
Warm-up
Hand out three paper shapes — a right triangle, a slanted (non-right) triangle, and a parallelogram — plus scissors. Challenge: "Turn each into a rectangle. No area may be created or destroyed."
The scissors are the theorem-provers today: every area formula in this lesson is a rectangle story in disguise, and students are about to discover all three by cutting.
Explore
Cut-and-rearrange lab: (1) Parallelogram → slice a right triangle off one end, slide it to the other end: a rectangle with the same base and height appears. (2) Triangle → two copies of ANY triangle (tape pairs' cutouts together) form a parallelogram: so one triangle is half of it. (3) Trapezoid → two copies form a parallelogram whose base is (top + bottom).
Each station records its discovery as a formula-with-picture. The height ruler matters everywhere: height is the PERPENDICULAR distance to the base line, not the slanted side — measure with a set square against the base.
Formalize
Formalize the three formulas, each carrying its rectangle story:
The one word doing all the work is HEIGHT: perpendicular to the base, possibly landing outside the shape (obtuse triangles — draw one and watch the height fall outside; the formula still holds). Any side can be the base; the height must match the chosen base.
Practice
Practice: six area computations across the three shapes, including one obtuse triangle (height outside), one trapezoid given upside-down, and one figure requiring decomposition into a rectangle plus a triangle.
Exit ticket: two triangles with the same base and equal heights but wildly different slants — same area or different? Prove with the formula and one sentence. (Same: never consulted the slant.)
Exit ticket
Practice: six area computations across the three shapes, including one obtuse triangle (height outside), one trapezoid given upside-down, and one figure requiring decomposition into a rectangle plus a triangle.
Exit ticket: two triangles with the same base and equal heights but wildly different slants — same area or different? Prove with the formula and one sentence. (Same: never consulted the slant.)
The triangle: base 10 cm along the bottom; the apex leans far right, past the base's end; height to that base is 4 cm, landing OUTSIDE the triangle.
Step 1: Draw the height honestly: extend the base line with a dashed ruler-line; drop the perpendicular from the apex to the extension — 4 cm.
Step 2: Apply the formula unchanged: cm².
Step 3: Verify by the two-copies argument: two copies of this triangle still tile a parallelogram of base 10 and height 4 — area 40, halved: 20 ✓. The formula never cared where the foot of the height landed.
Step 4: Moral for the anxious: extending the base line is legal and standard — the BASE is a line to measure to, not a fence to stay inside.
The bed: parallel sides 8 m (bottom) and 5 m (top), height 4 m.
Route 1 — the formula: m².
Route 2 — decompose: drop verticals from the top side's ends: a 5×4 rectangle (20) flanked by two right triangles sharing total base and height 4 → together . Total 26 ✓.
Route 3 — double and halve: two copies make a parallelogram of base , height 4 → 52, halved: 26 ✓.
Debrief: three independent routes to 26 is not showing off — it's how mathematicians actually verify. When two routes disagree someday, the third finds the liar.
The figure: an arrowhead — a large triangle (base 12 cm, height 8 cm) with a triangular notch (base 12, height 3) cut into its base, pointing inward.
Step 1: Choose the strategy: whole minus notch beats slicing into skinny pieces.
Step 2: Whole triangle: cm².
Step 3: Notch triangle: cm².
Step 4: Arrowhead: cm².
Step 5: Sanity via bounding: the arrowhead fits inside the big triangle (48) and clearly beats half of it — 30 sits right ✓.
Step 6: Name the two composite strategies now both in hand: ADD pieces (decomposition) or SUBTRACT holes (completion). Choosing the one with fewer, cleaner pieces is a skill worth grading on its own.