Multiplication and Division of Decimals
Warm-up
Hold up a store flyer: "Granola bars, $0.85 each. I'm buying 6." Ask for the total by mental math and collect strategies: some do cents cents ; some do . Both work — and both dodge the decimal until the end or split it sensibly.
Name the theme of the unit: decimal multiplication and division are whole-number operations plus PLACE-VALUE bookkeeping. The digits do what they always did; only the point needs managing.
Explore
Estimation-first workshop: for each of , , , pairs first bracket the answer ("more or less than 4.2? than 1?"), then compute with any method (grids, money, repeated reasoning), then reconcile.
The two shockers to let land: multiplying by a number less than 1 SHRINKS ( — smaller than both factors), and dividing by a number less than 1 GROWS (). The 10×10 grid shows why: 0.3 of 0.4 is a sliver of a sliver.
Formalize
Formalize both operations through whole-number arithmetic. Multiplication: multiply as whole numbers, then place the point so the answer has as many decimal places as the factors combined — because each factor was scaled by a power of ten:
Division: shift BOTH numbers' points until the divisor is whole () — legal because both scaled by the same factor, and a quotient is unchanged when both numbers grow tenfold. Then divide as usual. The estimate made first referees the point's final position.
Practice
Practice: six computations mixed with three estimation-only items ("is closer to 5, 50, or 500?"), one money problem, and one "place the point" puzzle where the digits 336 are given and students must position points to make true.
Exit ticket: compute AND explain with the grid or the fraction form why the answer is smaller than both factors.
Exit ticket
Practice: six computations mixed with three estimation-only items ("is closer to 5, 50, or 500?"), one money problem, and one "place the point" puzzle where the digits 336 are given and students must position points to make true.
Exit ticket: compute AND explain with the grid or the fraction form why the answer is smaller than both factors.
Step 1: Estimate: and → about (a bit under, since 2.7 rounded up more than 3.4).
Step 2: Multiply as whole numbers: .
Step 3: Place the point: one decimal place in each factor → two places total → .
Step 4: Reconcile with the estimate: vs ✓. Note how the estimate would have caught both classic errors: (too big) and (too small).
The context: \$5.46 buys juice at \$0.60 per cup. How many cups?
Step 1: Estimate: \$0.60 a cup, about \$5.50 → roughly 9 cups.
Step 2: Shift both points one place (multiply both by 10): .
Step 3: Divide: .
Step 4: Reconcile and interpret: 9.1 vs estimate 9 ✓. In the story: 9 full cups, with a tenth of a cup's worth of money left (6 cents). The division is exact; the story rounds it.
Step 5: Why shifting is legal, said once more: — top and bottom both times ten, and a fraction's value survives that.
The shelf: Brand A — 1.2 L for \$4.68. Brand B — 0.85 L for \$3.57.
Step 1: Unit price A: . Shift: → $3.90 per litre.
Step 2: Unit price B: . Shift twice: → $4.20 per litre.
Step 3: Verdict: A is cheaper per litre by \$0.30.
Step 4: The sanity checks that catch shifted-point disasters: a unit price near \$4/L should sit BETWEEN the two sticker prices divided by their sizes' neighbourhood — \$39.0/L or \$0.39/L would both scream. Estimates aren't decoration in decimal division; they're the guardrail the moving point demands.