Public · Sign in
MT
← Back to topic
LESSON PLAN

Operations with Decimals

A
Apothem Team
Grade 7 · Computational Fluency
LESSON AT A GLANCE
Warm-up
5 min
Explore
15 min
Formalize
10 min
Practice
12 min
Exit ticket
3 min

Warm-up

Put four computations on the board and ask which can be done ENTIRELY in the head: 0.25×80.25 \times 8, 3.6÷0.43.6 \div 0.4, 7.23.997.2 - 3.99, 0.1×0.10.1 \times 0.1. Pairs claim and defend — 0.25×80.25 \times 8 is "a quarter of 8" = 2; 3.6÷0.43.6 \div 0.4 is "how many 0.4s in 3.6" = 9; 7.23.997.2 - 3.99 begs compensation (4-4, then +0.01+0.01): 3.21; 0.1×0.1=0.010.1 \times 0.1 = 0.01 still fools half the room.

The unit consolidates all four decimal operations with fraction-thinking as the mental engine and place-value as the written one.

Explore

Strategy-pairing workshop: each computation type gets a written METHOD and a mental TRANSLATION side by side. Multiplication: 0.6×0.350.6 \times 0.35 by whole-number product + place count, AND as 610×35100=2101000\frac{6}{10} \times \frac{35}{100} = \frac{210}{1000}. Division: 4.8÷0.64.8 \div 0.6 by point-shifting, AND as "48 tenths shared into groups of 6 tenths → 8 groups."

The estimation gauntlet closes the lab: ten expressions, answers chosen from three magnitudes (0.42×0.50.42 \times 0.5: is it ≈ 0.02, 0.2, or 2?) — no computing allowed, only reasoning about size.

Formalize

Formalize the operations as place-value bookkeeping over whole-number arithmetic, with the fraction forms as the WHY:

0.6×0.35=610×35100=2101000=0.214.8÷0.6=486=80.6 \times 0.35 = \frac{6}{10}\times\frac{35}{100} = \frac{210}{1000} = 0.21 \qquad 4.8 \div 0.6 = \frac{48}{6} = 8

The four operations' alignment rules diverge and must be kept distinct: add/subtract stack the POINTS; multiply counts PLACES after whole-number work; divide SHIFTS both numbers until the divisor is whole. One sentence each, attached to its reason.

Practice

Practice: mixed 12-item set spanning all four operations with three mandatory estimates-first; two multi-step money problems; one error autopsy (points aligned for multiplication).

Exit ticket: compute 2.4×0.152.4 \times 0.15 and 2.4÷0.152.4 \div 0.15, then explain in one sentence why one answer is tiny and the other huge. (0.360.36 and 1616 — multiplying by a small number shrinks; dividing by one grows.)

Exit ticket

Practice: mixed 12-item set spanning all four operations with three mandatory estimates-first; two multi-step money problems; one error autopsy (points aligned for multiplication).

Exit ticket: compute 2.4×0.152.4 \times 0.15 and 2.4÷0.152.4 \div 0.15, then explain in one sentence why one answer is tiny and the other huge. (0.360.36 and 1616 — multiplying by a small number shrinks; dividing by one grows.)

TIP  The "multiply-makes-bigger" ghost returns at every grade: exorcise it weekly with one pair like 2.4×0.152.4 \times 0.15 vs 2.4÷0.152.4 \div 0.15 until the size-instinct flips reliably.
WORKED EXAMPLES
Example 1 — The fabric bill: multiplication with an estimate bodyguard

The purchase: 3.4 m of fabric at \$12.75 per metre.

Step 1: Estimate: 3.43.53.4 \approx 3.5 and 12.751312.75 \approx 13 → about 45.545.5. Expect low-to-mid forties.

Step 2: Whole-number multiply: 34×1275=43,35034 \times 1275 = 43{,}350.

Step 3: Place the point: one decimal place (3.43.4) + two (12.7512.75) = three → 43.35043.350 → $43.35.

Step 4: Reconcile: \$43.35 vs ≈\$45.5 ✓ (we rounded both factors up, so the true answer sits below the estimate — even the DIRECTION of the gap checks out).

Step 5: The receipts habit: money answers get two decimals and a size-check against the estimate, every time, forever.

Example 2 — The gas-tank division: how many fills?

The question: a jerrycan holds 18.9 L; a lawnmower tank takes 0.7 L per fill. How many full tanks does the can provide?

Step 1: Estimate: "how many 0.7s in about 19?" — 0.7 × 20 = 14, 0.7 × 27 = 18.9… expect around 27.

Step 2: Shift both one place: 189÷7=27189 \div 7 = 27.

Step 3: Answer: exactly 27 fills.

Step 4: Why the shift is legal, one more time with feeling: 18.90.7=1897\frac{18.9}{0.7} = \frac{189}{7} — both scaled by 10, the quotient unmoved. Division compares SIZES, and both sizes grew tenfold together.

Step 5: The interpretation reflex: had it come out 26.4, the story wants 26 full fills with a splash left — the remainder conversation from whole-number division, alive and well in decimals.

Example 3 — Order of operations with decimals: the deposit puzzle

Evaluate: 123×(4.21.7)+0.5212 - 3 \times (4.2 - 1.7) + 0.5^2.

Step 1: Parentheses: 4.21.7=2.54.2 - 1.7 = 2.5.

Step 2: Exponent: 0.52=0.250.5^2 = 0.25 (half of a half — the value that still surprises; a half squared is a QUARTER).

Step 3: Multiplication: 3×2.5=7.53 \times 2.5 = 7.5.

Step 4: Add/subtract left to right: 127.5=4.512 - 7.5 = 4.5; 4.5+0.25=4.754.5 + 0.25 = 4.75.

Step 5: The two landmines dodged, named: 0.5210.5^2 \ne 1 (squaring a number below 1 shrinks it), and the subtraction happened before the addition only because it stood to the LEFT — tier rules, decimal edition. Old grammar, new vocabulary.

MATERIALS
Estimation gauntlet cards
Place-value charts
Money manipulatives
Practice set (PDF)
WATCH FOR
!Points aligned for multiplication (imported from addition). Different operations, different bookkeeping — the three-rules table.
!Division by a decimal dodged by dividing the wrong direction (0.15÷2.40.15 \div 2.4). Estimate first: "how many 0.15s fit in 2.4? Lots" → answer must exceed 1.
!Trailing zeros dropped mid-computation changing place counts: 2.50×0.4=1.000=12.50 \times 0.4 = 1.000 = 1 ✓ but students who wrote 2.5 × 0.4 = 0.1 counted places on vanished zeros.