Operations with Decimals
Warm-up
Put four computations on the board and ask which can be done ENTIRELY in the head: , , , . Pairs claim and defend — is "a quarter of 8" = 2; is "how many 0.4s in 3.6" = 9; begs compensation (, then ): 3.21; still fools half the room.
The unit consolidates all four decimal operations with fraction-thinking as the mental engine and place-value as the written one.
Explore
Strategy-pairing workshop: each computation type gets a written METHOD and a mental TRANSLATION side by side. Multiplication: by whole-number product + place count, AND as . Division: by point-shifting, AND as "48 tenths shared into groups of 6 tenths → 8 groups."
The estimation gauntlet closes the lab: ten expressions, answers chosen from three magnitudes (: is it ≈ 0.02, 0.2, or 2?) — no computing allowed, only reasoning about size.
Formalize
Formalize the operations as place-value bookkeeping over whole-number arithmetic, with the fraction forms as the WHY:
The four operations' alignment rules diverge and must be kept distinct: add/subtract stack the POINTS; multiply counts PLACES after whole-number work; divide SHIFTS both numbers until the divisor is whole. One sentence each, attached to its reason.
Practice
Practice: mixed 12-item set spanning all four operations with three mandatory estimates-first; two multi-step money problems; one error autopsy (points aligned for multiplication).
Exit ticket: compute and , then explain in one sentence why one answer is tiny and the other huge. ( and — multiplying by a small number shrinks; dividing by one grows.)
Exit ticket
Practice: mixed 12-item set spanning all four operations with three mandatory estimates-first; two multi-step money problems; one error autopsy (points aligned for multiplication).
Exit ticket: compute and , then explain in one sentence why one answer is tiny and the other huge. ( and — multiplying by a small number shrinks; dividing by one grows.)
The purchase: 3.4 m of fabric at \$12.75 per metre.
Step 1: Estimate: and → about . Expect low-to-mid forties.
Step 2: Whole-number multiply: .
Step 3: Place the point: one decimal place () + two () = three → → $43.35.
Step 4: Reconcile: \$43.35 vs ≈\$45.5 ✓ (we rounded both factors up, so the true answer sits below the estimate — even the DIRECTION of the gap checks out).
Step 5: The receipts habit: money answers get two decimals and a size-check against the estimate, every time, forever.
The question: a jerrycan holds 18.9 L; a lawnmower tank takes 0.7 L per fill. How many full tanks does the can provide?
Step 1: Estimate: "how many 0.7s in about 19?" — 0.7 × 20 = 14, 0.7 × 27 = 18.9… expect around 27.
Step 2: Shift both one place: .
Step 3: Answer: exactly 27 fills.
Step 4: Why the shift is legal, one more time with feeling: — both scaled by 10, the quotient unmoved. Division compares SIZES, and both sizes grew tenfold together.
Step 5: The interpretation reflex: had it come out 26.4, the story wants 26 full fills with a splash left — the remainder conversation from whole-number division, alive and well in decimals.
Evaluate: .
Step 1: Parentheses: .
Step 2: Exponent: (half of a half — the value that still surprises; a half squared is a QUARTER).
Step 3: Multiplication: .
Step 4: Add/subtract left to right: ; .
Step 5: The two landmines dodged, named: (squaring a number below 1 shrinks it), and the subtraction happened before the addition only because it stood to the LEFT — tier rules, decimal edition. Old grammar, new vocabulary.