Public · Sign in
MT
← Back to topic
LESSON PLAN

Solving Equations

A
Apothem Team
Grade 7 · Algebra & Patterning
LESSON AT A GLANCE
Warm-up
5 min
Explore
15 min
Formalize
10 min
Practice
12 min
Exit ticket
3 min

Warm-up

Ask students to solve, mentally, "I think of a number, multiply by 4, subtract 7, and get 29." Nearly everyone un-does: 29+7=3629 + 7 = 36, 36÷4=936 \div 4 = 9. Then hand them 4x7=294x - 7 = 29 and watch the recognition land: they already solve equations — today formalizes the record-keeping for when mental undoing runs out.

Set the stakes honestly: two-step equations are the last size mental math handles; the both-sides method being formalized today is the one that scales to everything after.

Explore

Balance-mat progression: (1) two-step solves with chips and bags — 3x+2=143x + 2 = 14: remove 2 from both pans, split 12 among 3 bags. (2) Variables on BOTH sides — 5x+1=3x+95x + 1 = 3x + 9: remove three bags from each pan first (2x+1=92x + 1 = 9), a genuinely new move. (3) The distributive opener: 2(x+3)=162(x + 3) = 16 — either share the 2 first (2x+6=162x + 6 = 16) or halve both sides (x+3=8x + 3 = 8); pairs try both and time them.

Each solve gets its symbolic diary written next to the mat work, with the check-by-substitution stamped at the bottom.

Formalize

Formalize the method: simplify each side; collect the variable on one side by adding/subtracting terms from both; then peel constants and coefficients in reverse order of operations:

5x+1=3x+9  3x  2x+1=9  1  2x=8  ÷2  x=45x + 1 = 3x + 9 \;\xrightarrow{-3x}\; 2x + 1 = 9 \;\xrightarrow{-1}\; 2x = 8 \;\xrightarrow{\div 2}\; x = 4

The two legal-move principles that generate everything: same operation on both sides preserves truth; simplifying one side (combining like terms, distributing) rewrites without changing anything. Every line must remain a TRUE-or-solvable sentence — no orphan expressions.

Practice

Practice: six solves climbing from two-step to variables-both-sides to one distributive; two story-to-equation-to-solution problems; one "find the error" (a sign lost moving a term across).

Exit ticket: solve 4(n2)=n+74(n - 2) = n + 7 with every move labelled, then verify. (4n8=n+73n=15n=54n - 8 = n + 7 \to 3n = 15 \to n = 5; check: 4(3)=12=5+74(3) = 12 = 5+7 ✓.)

Exit ticket

Practice: six solves climbing from two-step to variables-both-sides to one distributive; two story-to-equation-to-solution problems; one "find the error" (a sign lost moving a term across).

Exit ticket: solve 4(n2)=n+74(n - 2) = n + 7 with every move labelled, then verify. (4n8=n+73n=15n=54n - 8 = n + 7 \to 3n = 15 \to n = 5; check: 4(3)=12=5+74(3) = 12 = 5+7 ✓.)

TIP  "Move the term" language causes the lost-sign plague. Enforce "subtract 3x3x from both sides" phrasing for two weeks; the sign errors halve.
WORKED EXAMPLES
Example 1 — Variables on both sides: the two phone plans meet

The setup: Plan A costs 25+0.10t25 + 0.10t (t texts); Plan B costs 10+0.25t10 + 0.25t. When are they equal?

Step 1: Set equal: 25+0.10t=10+0.25t25 + 0.10t = 10 + 0.25t.

Step 2: Collect variables (subtract 0.10t0.10t both sides): 25=10+0.15t25 = 10 + 0.15t.

Step 3: Peel the constant: 15=0.15t15 = 0.15t → divide: t=100t = 100 texts.

Step 4: Verify: A at 100: 25+10=3525 + 10 = 35; B: 10+25=3510 + 25 = 35 ✓.

Step 5: Interpret the crossover like a consumer: under 100 texts, B is cheaper (small base wins); over, A wins (cheap rate wins). Solving found WHERE; the interpretation says WHO cares.

Example 2 — The perimeter equation: geometry hires algebra

The problem: a rectangle's length is 5 cm more than its width; the perimeter is 38 cm. Find both dimensions.

Step 1: One variable for the unknown anchor: let ww = width; then length =w+5= w + 5.

Step 2: Perimeter equation: 2w+2(w+5)=382w + 2(w + 5) = 38.

Step 3: Simplify the left side FIRST (distribute, collect): 2w+2w+10=384w+10=382w + 2w + 10 = 38 \to 4w + 10 = 38.

Step 4: Solve: 4w=28w=74w = 28 \to w = 7; length =12= 12.

Step 5: Check in the GEOMETRY, not the equation: 2(7)+2(12)=14+24=382(7) + 2(12) = 14 + 24 = 38 ✓ and 12 is 5 more than 7 ✓. Two facts claimed, two facts verified — checks should test the story's every promise, not just re-run the algebra.

Example 3 — Error autopsy: the sign that teleported

The submitted solve: 7x4=2x+117x - 4 = 2x + 11; line 2: 7x2x=1147x - 2x = 11 - 4; line 3: 5x=75x = 7; line 4: x=1.4x = 1.4.

Step 1: Line 2 audit — left side: subtracting 2x2x from both sides ✓ legal. Right side: the 4-4 crossed over and became… still 4-4? It shows as 11411 - 4. But moving 4-4 legally means ADDING 4 to both sides → should be 11+411 + 4. The sign teleported unchanged; the balance broke.

Step 2: Repair from line 1: 7x4=2x+115x4=115x=15x=37x - 4 = 2x + 11 \to 5x - 4 = 11 \to 5x = 15 \to x = 3.

Step 3: Verify: 7(3)4=177(3) - 4 = 17 and 2(3)+11=172(3) + 11 = 17 ✓.

Step 4: The diagnostic for self-checking: an "ugly" answer (1.4) in a friendly-looking problem is a smell, and substitution (7(1.4)4=5.87(1.4) - 4 = 5.8 vs 2(1.4)+11=13.82(1.4) + 11 = 13.8 — not equal!) is the smoke alarm. Substitution catches EVERY algebra error, including the ones you can't name.

MATERIALS
Balance mats, bags, chips
Solve diaries (two-column: moves | reasons)
Story cards
Practice set (PDF)
WATCH FOR
!Terms "moved" across the equals sign with signs intact: 2x+1=92x=9+12x + 1 = 9 \to 2x = 9 + 1. Both-sides language prevents the teleport error.
!Distributing to only the first term: 2(x+3)2x+32(x+3) \to 2x + 3. The area picture (two rows of xx AND two rows of 3) re-anchors it.
!Dividing before collecting: 5x+1=3x+95x + 1 = 3x + 9 divided by 5 immediately — legal but chaos. Collect first, peel second.