Fractions, Decimals, and Percents
Warm-up
Flash a quiz-show scoreboard: "Contestant A answered correctly, B scored 84%, C scored 0.86. Who won?" Let pairs rank them (thirty seconds) and defend.
The rankings require a common language — and that's the unit: fractions, decimals, and percents are three dialects for one quantity, and fluency means converting without friction. (A: 85%, C: 86%, B: 84% → C wins.)
Explore
Conversion triangle workshop: each pair gets a set of quantities, each given in one dialect only (, 0.4, 65%, , 1.2, 5%), and must complete all three forms for each, recording the ROUTE they used (fraction→decimal by division; decimal→percent by ×100; percent→fraction by /100 then simplify).
Then the repeating-decimal wrinkle: convert and by division and meet and — some fractions refuse to terminate. Which ones? Pairs test denominators 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12 and conjecture: denominators built only from 2s and 5s terminate (they divide powers of ten); anything else repeats.
Formalize
Formalize the conversion routes around the triangle:
The benchmark family every student should own cold: , , , , . Unknown quantities get located relative to these before any computation.
Practice
Practice: complete a three-dialect table for eight quantities; order a mixed-dialect set on one number line; two application items (a test score comparison and a "which discount is deeper" judgment); one repeating-decimal conversion with the division shown.
Exit ticket: order , 0.6, 63% from least to greatest, showing the common form used. (.)
Exit ticket
Practice: complete a three-dialect table for eight quantities; order a mixed-dialect set on one number line; two application items (a test score comparison and a "which discount is deeper" judgment); one repeating-decimal conversion with the division shown.
Exit ticket: order , 0.6, 63% from least to greatest, showing the common form used. (.)
Step 1: Fraction → decimal by division: . (Route check: 8 divides 1000 evenly — denominator is all 2s — so termination was guaranteed.)
Step 2: Decimal → percent: .
Step 3: Locate against benchmarks: above (75%), one eighth (12.5%) short of a whole ✓ internally consistent.
Step 4: The reverse route as verification: ✓. Round-tripping a conversion is the self-check that costs ten seconds and catches everything.
The jacket lists $80 everywhere. Store A: " off." Store B: "22% off." Store C: "pay 0.77 of the price."
Step 1: Convert all three deals to one dialect — pay-fraction as a percent: A: pay = 75%. B: pay 78%. C: pay 77%.
Step 2: Rank the deals: A (pay 75%) beats C (77%) beats B (78%).
Step 3: Cash it out: A: ; C: $61.60; B: $62.40.
Step 4: Post-mortem on the marketing: "22% off" SOUNDS bigger than "a quarter off" to many shoppers because 22 > ¼'s visible 4. Dialects can disguise size; conversion is the x-ray. This is the same lesson as 0.6 vs 0.55, now with money attached.
Step 1: Divide: : into goes 4 (), remainder 2 → bring down: 20, goes 1 (), remainder 8 → 80, goes 6 (), remainder 8 → 80 again — the remainder repeated, so the digits repeat from here: .
Step 2: Say WHY it had to repeat: each step's remainder is one of only 12 possibilities (0–11); with finitely many remainders, one must recur, and recurrence locks the cycle.
Step 3: Predict before dividing (the denominators conjecture): — the 3 dooms termination ✓ matches.
Step 4: Percent form, honestly: , or "about 41.7%" with the approximation flagged. Repeating notation isn't pedantry — it's the difference between the number itself and its estimate.