Public · Sign in
MT
← Back to topic
LESSON PLAN

Writing and Evaluating Expressions

A
Apothem Team
Grade 8 · Algebra & Patterning
LESSON AT A GLANCE
Warm-up
5 min
Explore
15 min
Formalize
10 min
Practice
12 min
Exit ticket
3 min

Warm-up

The phone-plan translation race: "$30 base plus $5 per gigabyte" — write it algebraically. (30+5g30 + 5g.) Then reverse: hand them 12n812n - 8 and ask for a STORY that fits. (Twelve dollars a lawn, minus the $8 broken-rake fine…)

Both directions matter: Grade 8 expressions are about translating fluently between situations and symbols, then evaluating and simplifying with negative numbers fully in play.

Explore

Translation gymnasium: (1) situation→expression cards with near-miss decoys ("3 less than double n": 2n32n - 3, NOT 32n3 - 2n — order words are traps); (2) expression→situation invention with peer audit (does the story really produce n4+7\frac{n}{4} + 7?); (3) like-terms consolidation with negatives: 5x3+2x27x+9x2x22x+65x - 3 + 2x^2 - 7x + 9 - x^2 \to x^2 - 2x + 6, sorted physically with term-tiles first.

Evaluation follows with the parentheses ritual: x22x+6x^2 - 2x + 6 at x=3x = -3: (3)22(3)+6=9+6+6=21(-3)^2 - 2(-3) + 6 = 9 + 6 + 6 = 21.

Formalize

Formalize the anatomy and the two core skills:

3x25x+7: terms 3x2,5x,7; coefficients 3,5; constant 73x^2 - 5x + 7: \text{ terms } 3x^2, -5x, 7; \text{ coefficients } 3, -5; \text{ constant } 7

Like terms share the same variable part exactly (x2x^2 and xx are strangers); the sign travels WITH its term when sorting. Translation order-words table: "less than" and "subtracted from" flip the order; "quotient of a and b" is ab\frac{a}{b} in the stated order.

Practice

Practice: eight translations (both directions, decoys included); three simplifications with negatives and squared terms; three evaluations at negative inputs; one story-audit of a partner's invention.

Exit ticket: simplify 4a7a+2a234a - 7 - a + 2a^2 - 3 and evaluate at a=2a = -2. (2a2+3a102a^2 + 3a - 10; at 2-2: 8610=88 - 6 - 10 = -8.)

Exit ticket

Practice: eight translations (both directions, decoys included); three simplifications with negatives and squared terms; three evaluations at negative inputs; one story-audit of a partner's invention.

Exit ticket: simplify 4a7a+2a234a - 7 - a + 2a^2 - 3 and evaluate at a=2a = -2. (2a2+3a102a^2 + 3a - 10; at 2-2: 8610=88 - 6 - 10 = -8.)

TIP  "3 less than xx" writing as 3x3 - x is the most durable translation error in algebra. Weekly micro-drill of just the flip-phrases ("less than," "subtracted from," "fewer than") until the flip is reflexive.
WORKED EXAMPLES
Example 1 — The T-shirt fundraiser: build, simplify, evaluate

The setup: shirts cost \$6 each to print; the team sells at \$15 each; fixed table fee \$40.

Step 1: Build the profit expression for nn shirts: income 15n15n, costs 6n+406n + 40 → profit P=15n(6n+40)P = 15n - (6n + 40).

Step 2: Simplify — distribute the minus across BOTH cost terms: 15n6n40=9n4015n - 6n - 40 = 9n - 40.

Step 3: Evaluate at n=12n = 12: 9(12)40=10840=689(12) - 40 = 108 - 40 = 68 dollars.

Step 4: Interpret the simplified form's anatomy: the 9 is profit-per-shirt (margin), the 40-40 the fee's drag; break-even where 9n=409n = 40 → about 5 shirts. The SIMPLIFIED expression carried business meaning the raw one hid — simplification is translation into a more honest dialect.

Example 2 — The distribute-a-negative minefield: simplify 7x2(3x5)+47x - 2(3x - 5) + 4

Step 1: The minus-two distributes to BOTH terms inside: 2×3x=6x-2 \times 3x = -6x and 2×(5)=+10-2 \times (-5) = +10.

Step 2: Rewrite fully: 7x6x+10+47x - 6x + 10 + 4.

Step 3: Collect: x+14x + 14.

Step 4: Autopsy the two standard wrecks: (a) distributing only to the first term (7x6x5+4=x17x - 6x - 5 + 4 = x - 1 ✗); (b) losing the sign on the second (7x6x10+4=x67x - 6x - 10 + 4 = x - 6 ✗). Both die at the same checkpoint: numerical spot-check at x=1x = 1 — original: 72(2)+4=157 - 2(-2) + 4 = 15; our answer: 1+14=151 + 14 = 15 ✓; wreck (a): 0 ✗; wreck (b): 5-5 ✗.

Step 5: The spot-check habit: one cheap substitution referees any simplification dispute, permanently.

Example 3 — Two expressions, one pattern: the bordered pool

The design: a square pool of side ss metres gets a 1-metre tile border. How many 1×1 tiles?

Step 1: Student A counts by strips: four side-strips of ss tiles plus four corner tiles: 4s+44s + 4.

Step 2: Student B counts by subtraction: big square minus pool: (s+2)2s2(s+2)^2 - s^2.

Step 3: Are they the same? Test s=3s = 3: A gives 16; B gives 259=1625 - 9 = 16 ✓. Test s=10s = 10: 44 and 144100=44144 - 100 = 44 ✓.

Step 4: Show it symbolically (a preview of expanding, kept gentle): (s+2)2=s2+4s+4(s+2)^2 = s^2 + 4s + 4, so B =s2+4s+4s2=4s+4= s^2 + 4s + 4 - s^2 = 4s + 4 = A. Two honest countings of one border MUST agree — and the algebra just proved it for every pool at once.

Step 5: The takeaway that fuels all of algebra: equivalent expressions are different STORIES about the same quantity, and simplification is how you find out two stories match.

MATERIALS
Translation card decks
Term tiles
Story-audit rubric
Practice set (PDF)
WATCH FOR
!Order-word flips missed. The micro-drill.
!Unlike terms merged: 2x2+3x=5x32x^2 + 3x = 5x^3-style disasters. Tiles make "same shape" literal.
!Signs orphaned during collection: the 7x-7x contributing a bare 7x7x somewhere. Sign-glued-to-term sorting.