Operations with Fractions
Warm-up
The baking emergency: "The recipe serves 12 and needs cups of flour. You're making it for 8 people. Flour?" Pairs attack freely — the scale factor emerges, then the multiplication .
Grade 8 fractions are all four operations at full strength — mixed numbers, division included — deployed inside real contexts. (Answer: cups.)
Explore
Division-of-fractions summit — the operation that was postponed until it could be understood: (1) Common-denominator route: = "how many eighths in six eighths?" = 6. (2) The pattern route to invert-and-multiply: dividing by 2 is halving (× ½); dividing by ½ is doubling (× 2); dividing by is… × — the reciprocal, forced by pattern. (3) Verify both routes agree on .
Then mixed-operation workout with mixed numbers, converting at entry, computing, converting at exit.
Formalize
Formalize all four with the division rule now justified:
The "why" of invert-and-multiply kept alive in one sentence: division asks "how many of THIS fit in THAT," and fitting -sized pieces goes times as often as fitting whole units. Size-check every quotient: dividing by a number under 1 must ENLARGE.
Practice
Practice: mixed set of 10 spanning all operations (mixed numbers in half); two multi-step recipes; one "how many servings" division story; one error autopsy (invert-the-wrong-fraction).
Exit ticket: , exact, with a one-line size-check. (; dividing by less than 1 grew it ✓.)
Exit ticket
Practice: mixed set of 10 spanning all operations (mixed numbers in half); two multi-step recipes; one "how many servings" division story; one error autopsy (invert-the-wrong-fraction).
Exit ticket: , exact, with a one-line size-check. (; dividing by less than 1 grew it ✓.)
The vat: litres of soup; each serving is L. How many servings?
Step 1: Convert: .
Step 2: Divide (fit -sized scoops): .
Step 3: Cancel before multiplying (the fluency move): and → servings.
Step 4: Size-check: dividing by a piece smaller than 1 L must yield MORE servings than litres — 12 > 7.5 ✓.
Step 5: The cancel-early habit isn't cosmetic: it kept every number single-digit. Fraction fluency is mostly factor-spotting.
The job: a room needs L of paint. You have L left from before, and paint sells in L cans. How many cans, and how much surplus?
Step 1: Paint needed beyond stock: L.
Step 2: Cans: → buy 2 cans (round UP — the vans problem's logic, in litres).
Step 3: Surplus: bought L; used → left over L.
Step 4: The pipeline audit: subtraction (needed common denominators), division (invert-multiply), a context round-up, and a final subtraction — four decisions, each chosen by the STORY. That choosing is the Grade 8 skill; the mechanics were Grades 6–7.
The submitted work: .
Step 1: Spot the move: the student inverted the DIVIDEND () and left the divisor alone. Wrong fraction flipped.
Step 2: The size-check would have caught it: dividing by a number less than 1 must produce something BIGGER than — but ? ( vs — actually is barely bigger… the check is inconclusive here; honesty matters). Use the story check instead: "how many s in ?" — a bit more than one (). The claimed … also near one. The autopsy needs the actual rule.
Step 3: Correct: — "a bit more than one" ✓ matching the story estimate.
Step 4: The honest lesson: some errors produce near-plausible answers that slip past loose checks. The rule's ANCHOR (divisor is the piece being fitted; IT gets inverted) is the defence when numerical checks come back fuzzy.