Financial Literacy — Interest and Budgeting
Warm-up
The two-offers dilemma, projected: "Your $1,000 summer earnings can sit in (a) a savings account at 4% per year, or (b) your cousin's 'investment' promising 'double in 5 years.' Which grows faster?" Compute the account: . The cousin promises $2,000. "So the cousin wins?" — pause — "What questions should you ask first?" (Risk. Guarantee. Getting it back at all.)
Grade 9 finance: simple and compound interest computed honestly, and return weighed against risk like an adult.
Explore
Interest laboratory: (1) simple interest builds the table by hand: $500 at 6% simple → +$30 every year, linear, ; (2) compound interest builds ITS table: interest on the balance, so , each row ×1.06 — exponential, ; (3) the race graph: both curves from one axis — twins for two years, then compounding pulls away forever.
Then the budget clinic returns at Grade 9 scale: a part-time-job monthly budget with fixed/variable classification, a savings rate CHOSEN first, and one debt scenario (a \$300 phone on a payment plan at 20% — the true total computed, the "low monthly payment" spell broken).
Formalize
Formalize both interest models:
The structural read: simple interest is LINEAR (slope — same dollars every year); compound is EXPONENTIAL (multiplier — same PERCENT every year, growing dollars). Every lesson about lines vs exponentials this year replays here with money as the y-axis. Rule-of-thumb seeded: at rate %, doubling takes roughly years.
Practice
Practice: one simple and one compound computation with tables; the race graphed for a chosen ; one doubling-time estimate via the 72 rule checked by table; one payment-plan autopsy (total paid vs sticker); one budget build with a defended savings rate.
Exit ticket: $800 at 5% for 10 years — simple vs compound totals. (; — the gap IS the interest-on-interest.)
Exit ticket
Practice: one simple and one compound computation with tables; the race graphed for a chosen ; one doubling-time estimate via the 72 rule checked by table; one payment-plan autopsy (total paid vs sticker); one budget build with a defended savings rate.
Exit ticket: $800 at 5% for 10 years — simple vs compound totals. (; — the gap IS the interest-on-interest.)
Step 1: Simple: — forty dollars… $100 per year, every year, flat.
Step 2: Compound: .
Step 3: The gap: \$155 — entirely interest-ON-interest, the linear model's blind spot.
Step 4: Stretch the horizon to feel the divergence: at 20 years — simple $4,000; compound . At 40: $6,000 vs $14,080. Time is the compounding's fuel; the young hold more of it than anyone — said plainly, this is why starting to save at 15 beats starting at 30 by more than double.
Step 5: The 72-rule check: at 5%, doubling ≈ 14.4 years — the 20-year compound figure (\$5.3k from \$2k) sits past one doubling and shy of two… ✓ consistent.
The offer: \$300 phone for "just \$28/month over 12 months!"
Step 1: Total paid: .
Step 2: The financing cost: \$36 on \$300 — as a percent: 12% for one year of borrowing.
Step 3: Compare alternatives: three months of saving \$100 → phone bought outright, \$36 kept. The plan's real product is IMPATIENCE, priced at \$36.
Step 4: When the plan is nonetheless rational: if the phone enables a job (delivery apps need phones) earning more than \$36 in those three months — borrowing to access income can pay. The math doesn't moralize; it PRICES, and then the person decides with the price visible.
Step 5: The reflex installed: every "per month" offer gets multiplied out and compared to the sticker before any signature. Total-cost thinking is the single highest-yield habit this course teaches.
The situation: \$480/month from a weekend job. Build the budget.
Step 1: Savings FIRST (pay-yourself-first, now with a rate): choose 20% → \$96 to savings off the top.
Step 2: Fixed commitments: phone \$45, transit pass \$60 → \$105.
Step 3: Remaining for variable (food out, fun, gifts): .
Step 4: The shock test: the bike needs a \$140 repair this month. Options ranked: variable absorbs it (\$139 left — tight but alive); savings raid (\$96 + \$44 from variable — the emergency fund doing its one job); or the payment-plan trap (decline — Example 2 priced it).
Step 5: The structural lesson: the 20% savings line WAS the shock absorber — budgets without one don't survive contact with reality. After six months at this rate: \$576 buffer ≈ more than a month's income. Financial resilience, derived from one habit and arithmetic.